Seems that one of the great “divides” that challenges evangelical salvation theology is the question of exactly when were we saved, and who was saved. The traditional theology taught by most evangelicals is that Jesus made the PROVISION for salvation at the cross, but we as individuals are not actually saved until we repent of our sins, ask for forgiveness, and “accept Jesus into our heart”. This has created the whole model for missiology and evangelism in the evangelical church.

The other camp that is gaining momentum says that Jesus saved the whole world at the cross, and that nothing needs to be done by people to add to that. Jesus’ work was 100% complete and successful and he saved all who ever lived or ever would live. We as individuals were saved when Jesus does and rose again. We do not all know this, and we need to preach the gospel to tell people the good news about who they really are.

Both points can be proof-texted using scripture. A case can be made for either view. Depending on your bias you can make a case for either view.

But boiled down to it’s essence what is in question is the “when” of salvation. In Christ 2000 years ago for all mankind or at the point of decision for each of us as individuals. When seen that way it seems a bit nit-picky doesn’t it? I am one who leans towards the latter view, that ALL means all and we were all saved as the human race 2000 years ago at the cross. But I also see that many do not know this, operate out of a false identity, do bad things and make huge messes. They need to know what Jesus did for them 2000 years ago. So we evangelize, just from a place of victory, not defeat. They do need to repent (change their minds) about who they are and about who God is. The ones in need of this the most are… the evangelical church.